The
new animated Tim Burton Frankenweenie film based on his earlier 1984 live
character film is much more effective in conveying its themes through freedom
of action and the possibilities presented with the use of stop motion picture.
An
obvious advantage of using clay characters is the opportunity to control the
action of the film’s animals. In the 1984 movie, camera movement was used to
show Sparky’s action through what he sees in his eyes. I assume this is because
the dog actor could not do exactly what Burton wanted him to do. In the
animation, Sparky could do absolutely anything at all that Tim Burton wanted. We are also able to follow Sparky more and he has more personality due to the control Burton has over his clay characters.
Speaking
of animals, there is no possible way the monsters created by the other kids towards
the end of the movie could have been a part of the earlier film. They were just
too ridiculous. Where would one go to find a bat/cat actor anyway? It doesn’t
matter. Burton could just build one out of clay, and it could fly and be nasty
and look awesome. The coolest animals to me were the sea monkeys because they
were so funny and so evil.
Victor
and his friends are a strange looking bunch. Burton was able to make more
references to old monster movies using the clay characters. He could shape and
deform them to his liking. For example, Edgar is a totally creepy hunchback
with weird hands. And the little girl with the cat could not have looked less
realistic. It is as if we are inside one of Burton’s short poems, watching his
weird characters live their weird lives.
Basically,
Burton was able to get much more creative with his characters in the animated
movie than in the live characters movie. Creating things is what he does best,
and that talent really shines in stop motion picture.
There
are advantages to both methods that Burton uses. With stop motion animation,
there is more creative possibility. But with live actors, the audience feels
that the story is more real. It is set in a real neighborhood, using a real
dog. Though it is less likely that the audience will believe that the dog
really did come back to life, it is more likely that they might identify with
the characters. This is perhaps why parents were so afraid to let their
children watch the 1984 film. They might think that zombie dogs could exist, and
that is kind of a creepy thing to think about.
It
is interesting that Burton did so many versions of Frankenweenie. I wonder
which one he prefers. Each has a unique quality and style, but they all get at
the same basic point; which is Victor’s curiosity about the afterlife or
perhaps his unwillingness to accept that there is an afterlife. I prefer the
most recent stop motion version because it is cute and creepy and creative all
at the same time.